Talk:Pattern recognition
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Merge with statistical classification somehow? -- hike395 08:25, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Done. Made this the main article. -- hike395 15:42, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Should this include unsupervised methods, too? E.g., clustering has major applications for pattern recognition. -- 16:55, 25 Mar 2005 (MET)
I disagree --- that material is already covered in unsupervised learning. Both supervised and unsupervised learning are covered in a high-level way at machine learning. -- hike395 17:37, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Link to peer reviewed paper
Hi, I recently added some new information regarding the coparison of various classification techniques with a reference to a peer reviewed article (van der Walt and Barnard). There seems to be some controversy on this subject, the link has been removed several times. I am currently doing my PhD on this topic an I know the information is very relevant.
Is the reference and the external link http://www.pattenrecognition.co.za suitable for this site? If not, what can I do so that this information is not repeatedly removed?
cvdwalt
[edit] Merging/reorganizing Pattern recognition and statistical classification
Why has statistical classification been redirected to pattern recognition of all places? Statistical classification far pre-dates pattern recognition or machine learning and has uses far beyond either. I think it is more properly a category within statistics and/or cladistics/taxonomy than pattern recognition. A link to it is warranted from this page, but why the redirect? -- User:Jrbouldin
- Take a look at [1], which was the old statistical classification article before the merge. It was entirely about statistical classification algorithms, which is the subject of this article and has more detail here. If you think there is more material in statistical classification beyond the material here (or in supervised learning), feel free to write something up. We can also refactor it into the right spot. If you want to write a draft (and not make an "official" article), you can write something at statistical classification/temp, and we can discuss what to do with it. It's up to you. --- hike395 June 29, 2005 22:32 (UTC)
- Thank you for the clarification and other advice. I am new but will give it a shot. Seems to me the topic needs to made more general.Jeeb 1 July 2005 01:39 (UTC)
Please see Talk:statistical classification for a continuation of this discussion. Thanks! hike395
[edit] Human pattern recognition?
Numerology (for example) links here and yet this article is entirely about pattern recognition as performed by machines. Surely humans recognize patterns too. Recury 21:00, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, how about some information on patern recognition in humans? 66.24.195.123 12:39, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] removing Hidden messages sidebar
"Hidden messages" sidebar is out of main topic of "Pattern recognition". I see no need to have in such a dominant place links to themes like Reverse speech or Numerology. I suggest removing sidebar "Hidden messages". Msm 10:51, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
- No one was against my suggestion in a week time, so I remove hidden messages because of reasons written above. Msm 22:47, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Rule of three
Someone links to Rule of three (writing) in the See Also section. I see no relevance so I'll remove it. Could someone give justification here before putting it back in. --Offput 15:40, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
