User talk:Paulscf
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Suburb Articles
Good job on the Rydalmere and Meadowbank articles. Do you really think election results belong in suburb articles though?
Wouldn't it be better to create an article for each electoral area? This article would contain electoral results leaving each suburb to link to its respective electoral areas. The Ermington article (which I look after) is an example of what I mean. For Rydalmere, you will find articles already exist for it's Federal and Local electorates. Advantages of such a scheme are:
- It is technically correct. Electorates and suburbs are different things, deserving separate articles. It might be argued that the booth results for a particular suburb belong in its article, but the electoral results for Ermington, Paramatta, Dundas (and every other suburb in the Parramatta electorate) hardly belong in an article about Rydalmere.
- It avoids duplicating electoral results across multiple suburb articles (pretty well every electoral area contains multiple suburbs)
- It makes updating the electoral results easier, do to the lack of duplication.
- It provides a logical place to keep a record of past electoral results.
- It makes it easier to clearly provide information an all three levels of elections: Federal, State and Local.
John Dalton 07:00, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
JOhn all your recommendations are solid, they will clarify the topic well. thanks.
[edit] Several images listed for deletion
In the interest of not clogging your talk page with deletion notices, please consider this a deletion warning - I have listed a number of your images at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2006 July 22 that I believe to be copyright violations. Please examine your other image contributions [1] and make sure that you are the author of everything you have marked as such. Uploading images that are not your own and dow not qualify for "fair use" does not help Wikipedia. Rather, it only creates work for other people. BigDT 04:50, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Mlc centre.jpg
I have added this one to WP:IFD as well since it obviously came from [2] or somewhere very much like it. Please do not upload photographs that you did not create. All it can do is cause legal problems for Wikipedia and/or create extra work for someone to remove them.
[edit] Paddy
Hi, Thanks for taking and adding the pic of Patrick White's house: nice.
I've copied your ABC template and will add it to my user page.
Tony 06:39, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:Mao_propaganda.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mao_propaganda.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:58, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Mateo junior roos.JPG
Thank you for uploading Image:Mateo junior roos.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you created this image yourself, please look at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#For image creators, select one of those tags, and add it to the image. To do that, simply go to Image:Mateo junior roos.JPG, click "edit this page", and add the appropriate tag. Be sure to remove the current tag indicating a lack of licensing!
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me at User talk:Angr or at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. —Angr 19:48, 7 February 2007 (UTC)