User talk:Payne2thamax
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. Be bold in editing pages. Here are some links that you might find useful:
- Try the Tutorial. If you have less time, try Wikipedia:How to edit a page.
- To sign your posts (for eg. on talk pages) use ~~~~ (four tildes). This will insert your name and timestamp. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes).
- You can experiment in the Sandbox.
- For help, see Wikipedia:Where to ask a question.
- Some other pages that will help you know more about Wikipedia: Manual of Style and Wikipedia:Five pillars, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Civility, Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not
- You can contribute in many ways: write a great article, fight vandalism, upload pictures, perform maintainance tasks, contribute to existing projects...
I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Wikipedia. Drop us a note at Wikipedia:New user log.
-- utcursch | talk 03:46, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Guidelines ?
Hello, Payne2thamax. Where's the guideline at WP:HOCKEY, calling for ALL HHOFers being added to the 30 NHL team pages. Example- Fuhr at St. Louis Blues. There's is a guideline at WPTP that calls for the reversal of your recent edits. GoodDay 18:54, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- Too end continuing disputes of the HHOF section of the 30 NHL team articles, I'm recommending the HHOF section be 'removed'. See my postings at WPH & WPT. GoodDay 20:49, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- As I've stated earlier: Who's in the HHoF section, doesn't concern me. Personally, I'd rather the HHoF section be deleted or made into a seperate article. Anyway, It's seems the guideline in question is soon gonna be repealed. Furthermore this WP has no 'HHoF section' guideline at all. Before you made your 'edits' to add names to the HHoF sections (on Jan 23, 2007), you should have first started a 'consensus discussion' to repeal the quideline. It would have avoided alot of hassle. GoodDay 20:54, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Why are you pestering me, about the growing consensus to remove the HHoF guideline from NHL team pages? I've voted to remove it. GoodDay 19:12, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- As I'm not a member of Wikipedia: WikiProject Ice Hockey, I've reversed the guidelines on WPT, putting back the 'restrictions' on HHOF lists. Perhaps my removing it previously, was overstepping my authority. GoodDay 20:41, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Rangers HHOFers
I have been reading about the guideline, which says that the players must have played several seasons for the team, doesn't it? bmitchelf•T•F 23:19, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- A consensus was reached 'to remove' the restrictive guideline atWikipedia: WikiProject Ice Hockey/Team pages format. But so far, no Member of Wikipedia: WikiProject Ice Hockey has removed it. GoodDay 23:35, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- 'Restrictive guideline' has been removed (for good, honestly). Therefore, someone like Sawchuck, can be added to the Rangers HHOF section. GoodDay 00:16, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- Removed 'Bobby Hull' again. See discussion at Talk: New York Rangers. GoodDay 00:07, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- 'Restrictive guideline' has been removed (for good, honestly). Therefore, someone like Sawchuck, can be added to the Rangers HHOF section. GoodDay 00:16, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
I'm no longer concerned with the content of the 'Honoured Members/HHOF sections' of the 30 NHL team pages. Add or subtract, whatever you wish. I won't fuss about it anymore. GoodDay 21:17, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Calgary Flames
It was a consensus at WPT to have the HHOF section, renamed the 'Honoured Members'. The contents are to be in paragraph form (like the Devils page). GoodDay 00:41, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] No personal attacks
Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Sfacets 00:46, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Personal attacks in edit summaries at N.W.A.
This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks, as you did at N.W.A, you will be blocked for disruption. --JaimeLesMaths (talk!edits) 08:25, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Please do not remove warnings from your user talk page
According to our vandalism policy, "removing warnings from one's own talk page is often frowned upon." Please stop. If you have a concern, please contact me on my talk page. --JaimeLesMaths (talk!edits) 20:33, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. Húsönd 21:15, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
