Wikipedia:Pictures needing attention

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It has been suggested that this page or section be merged with Images for cleanup. (Discuss)

Many of us have photographs which could be used on Wikipedia, but we just don't quite know of what they are. When requesting comment on an image, include any information you do know about the picture, such as the approximate date and place it was taken, and what you need to know.

To request new pictures and diagrams, see Wikipedia:Requested pictures.

1 How to add your query
2 Pictures

[edit] How to add your query

If you have problems formatting your question, someone else will probably fix it. However, you may find it useful to copy this form and paste it in the edit box:

<br style="clear:both;" /> ===[[:Image:FILENAME.JPG|Name of image]]=== [[Image:FILENAME.JPG|thumb|CAPTION]] Add what you know about the image here, and ask your question. - ~~~~ * Follow-up replies go here.

[edit] Pictures

[edit] Oaks images by Zubron

I've listed selected images uploaded by Zubron. There are oak photos with some man in the foreground. Due to this persona presence, these photos are (in my opinion) unencyclopedical and they are better fit to a family-photo album. I suggest to delete them and/or move out from articles. Here is the list:

Example

Visor 16:40, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

For me having a person in the photo is actually useful, as it provides a sense of scale. One could of course just put a meter stick in the photo somewhere, but would that look better? Balcer 22:26, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Yes, for sure. As is the person included in these photos, somebody can compare human with size of a tree. After cogitate your point I support photos, where this comparison is sensible (eg. Image:Oak in Bialowieza3(Oak Emperor of the South).jpg). But consider existing photos, such as Image:Oak in Bialowieza1(Great Mamamuszi).jpg, Image:Oak in Bialowieza1(Oak Emperor of the South).jpg. In my humble opinion, there is no meaning of these photos. Visor 23:13, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Foo.jpg

Closeup of Lady of Guadalupe

This image needs to be renamed to something less generic, I couldn't figure out how to do so. Is it even possible? - PxT 18:51, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

I believe you have to download the picture, upload it under the name you want, redirect the old page to the new (probably not necessary in this case), and copy over the image history as text into the description. --ʀ6ʍɑʏ89 06:04, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
Fixed the tag Judgesurreal777 03:24, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Replaced image with eyedetl.jpg

[edit] Wikipedia:Unidentified flowers

From the leftovers of Wikipedia. These flowers from Belize aren't named yet. [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk)]] 15:22, Oct 13, 2004 (UTC)

[edit] The Logo

I'm not that much of a graphics person, as this shows, but the logo is a view of a 3D object. I know it's a subtle touch and my clicks in paint are inadequte for the front page, but shouldn't we be able to see the lines on the back side of the puzzle peices? Who ~really~ does graphics on the wiki? -- Dbroadwell 06:39, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Image:Nohat-logo-nowords-bgwhite-200px.gif

Sorry, had to un-thumb this, at thumb size you can't see what i'm showing. -- Dbroadwell 06:42, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- I'd abandon this, becaue this seems as if it us done for a better look or whatever. --PhilippWeissenbacher 17:18, July 17, 2005 (UTC)
  - Maybe the 'back side' of the sphere puzzle is less complete (or has been dismantled even more) than the top. Hence, the 'lines' are not seen from this viewpoint. Image looks fine to me. --Cactus.man 10:56, 1 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Nauton_Park.jpeg‎

Mis-spelt Naughton

I uploaded this image and plan to use it - however Nauton should be spelt 'Naughton'. How can I fix this?

DamienLaughton 10:59, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

See "Foo.jpg" above --Minkus 01:32, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Surrey shield.jpg

This is an image of the Surrey Coat of Arms. After a bit of prodding around, I found a few other versions (including a better one). Is there a standard procedure for dealing with this situation (i.e. using the best looking/least copyrighted version)? Full details here. - Chris Bradshaw 23:01, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../p/i/c/Wikipedia%7EPictures_needing_attention_fc63.html"

Category: Items to be merged