From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1f1e/d1f1ef6e0437f537cf3cc5ed8603ae83182c8226" alt="" |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cuba. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
|
Start |
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. |
High |
This article is on a subject of High priority within the scope of Wikiproject Cuba. |
Cuba To-do:
Task list
- New article announcements
- Requests: Sport in Cuba, Yaguajay
- Stubs: Dollar store (Cuba), Celia Sánchez
- Verify: History of Cuba, Fulgencio Batista
- Update: 2006 Cuban transfer of presidential duties
- NPOV: History of Cuba, Delfin Fernandez, Armando Valladares
- Copyedit: Bay of Pigs invasion, Julio Antonio Mella, Fabio Grobart, Armando Peraza
- Wikify:
- Merge:
- Cleanup: Bay of Pigs invasion, History of Cuba, War Against the Bandits, Abelardo Colomé Ibarra, List of Cubans, Máximo Gómez, Antonio Maceo Grajales
- Style: Fidel Castro
- Expand: Cuban-Soviet relations, Chivatos, Baseball in Cuba, Religion in Cuba, Havana's International Book Fair, Cuba-Venezuela relations, Antonio Sánchez de Bustamante y Sirven
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Platt Amendment article.
This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.
|
|
|
Article policies
|
Help......???
Dude.. Basically- The Cubans had accepted the political dominance of the United States that was expressed in the Platt Amendment of 1901
[edit] crushed or not?
This article says "US troops were not used to crush the revolt", the article on the Roosevelt Corollary says "U.S. troops landed in Cuba, suppressed the revolt". Which one is right? Joriki 08:07, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
Well, according to what you said, the revolt was NOT used to crush the revolt....they only suppressed the revolt....Did the article say that the U.S. forces crushed the revolt or no?