Talk:Popomundo
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article was nominated for deletion on 2007-01-09. The result of the discussion was nomination withdrawn. |
[edit] Keep the article?
This article has already been deleted once. Should we really keep it? Did anything change since the last deletion? Perhaps Popomundo is more famous now? --Emc² (contact me) 01:11, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
- I think we should keep this article. I think we should keep it for the simple reason that it doesn't harm Wikipedia, it simply expands its database. If people want to know about it, they should have the opportunity to find an article about it on Wikipedia. I think it should be modified to better grammatically suit Wikipedia, but other than that I don't see any valid reason to delete the article. --GorillazRDaBest 16:18, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
-
- I think we should keep it too, as I'm a big Popomundo fan, although perhaps many people think that the relevance of the game is not as encyclopedic as it should be, therefore we have to choose, whether to improve the article trying to keep it, or to simply accept the fact that Popo hasn't yet become as important as it surely deserves to be. --Emc² (contact me) 12:06, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- My choice is to improve it, although I haven't the slightest idea what would make it better suited to Wikipedia. I hope it doesn't get deleted because I'm quite a big "Popofan" aswell. --GorillazRDaBest 18:10, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
-
- Something is going to have to be done or this will be deleted. I'm going to post a link on the Popo forums... If we need a model the Hattrick page is a good article. -DMurphy 03:52, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
- Definate keep for me, the game is noticeable enough as it is growing towards 100,000 users now, especially as we have many hundreds of pages for games related to obselete comsoles that barely qualify as stubs that noone complains about.Hackerjack 17:49, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Sourcing and article status
Although the most recent AFD was withdrawn after appropriate sourcing was provided, the article itself would greatly benefit from a revision that incorporates and cites that material, both to provide a better article and to ensure that no third trip to AFD is necessary. Serpent's Choice 07:09, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
