Image talk:Prokudin-Gorskii-09-edit2.jpg
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A comment: I don't quite understand why an *edited* version of this image would be displayed as a Featured Picture, especially one with a modified colour balance. More than being a nice picture (which it certainly is), this image is particularly interesting since it demonstrates a pioneering technique in colour photography. By changing the levels and modifying the colours, you aren't being true to the original - you might succeed in making the photo 'prettier', but it's certainly not encyclopaedic. Brokentooth 03:07, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
I agree totally - it looks exactly like a modern photo, which is impressive IF true. However the interest (and charm) of old processes is to see them exactly as they were taken, and including the effects of aging. The colour photos of J-H Lartigue could no doubt be modernised in order to lose all their period appeal! Moel Faban 10:08, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
- This is a cropped version of the original; no color changes were made in this edit. 67.71.77.143 10:47, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
- Ah, then that's fine. I just saw this line - Edited by Fir0002. Levels, color balance, removal of noise, minor sharpening, and didn't quite agree with modifying colour balance and levels.Brokentooth 18:40, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
This is the original color. No digital postprocessing done. Imagine how this looked to people in 1910 if you're so impressed by it today
OK, now I'm really amazed - I never knew such quality was achieved so long ago. Moel Faban 22:47, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
- I am also stunned by this picture, even after viewing it in its high-rez version. Does anyone know of other old pictures that are like this? because I still can't believe it.
- --Jadger
