Talk:Professional Contractors Group
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Article on Information World Review
I know nothing about this company, but I just thought I'd note that they wrote their own entry. Check out this article for more information. As long as the article is balanced, this should be no issue. But someone with familiarity in the field might want to take a look. —BrianSmithson 14:15, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
This article reads like advertizing copy. It should be on the PCG's personal website, not Wikipedia. WP:ISNOT a soapbox or a personal webhost. --Ryan Delaney talk 21:33, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
- I agree, but I don't think we should delete it either—it just needs to be pared down and cleaned up. --Delirium 22:28, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
-
- Google says this group is notable enough. Apparently they got some press attention, so there should be no problem regarding the Original Research policy. bogdan | Talk 23:20, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
Actually PCG is (was) pretty important and put up a good fight against the UK government Blairite junta at the time of their introduction of IR35 and nearly succeeded in derailing it altogether. On those grounds alone and with a bit of editing this article should be allowed to stand. Sjc 09:19, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
No one is trying to get the article deleted, don't worry. I would just prefer that the article was less adulatory, and had a more neutral tone. --Ryan Delaney talk 19:15, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
I am an ex-member of this group. It certainly does read like copy, and has no real critique. I will add some details to rebalance this hype. TMYNS 12:10, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
