User talk:Professorgupta
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Feel free to let me know if you have any questions or concerns regarding my posts. I will try my best to add relevant and important content as it pertains to Indian society, indian culture, indian cities, real estate, sports, mathematics, physics, business, teaching. I will also go through articles written by others with possibly poor grammar and fix it.
I removed a link that you added to Freddy Garcia. The link was misplaced--External Links should appear at the bottom of an article. It was also redundant, as the baseball-reference link contains all the same data. Just wanted to let you know. Doctofunk 22:21, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Pralay (band)
I did not write this content myself. I moved it from Pralay. Therefore, none of that material is mine.
- Hi Professorgupta, thanks for the response. I apologise if it seemed like I was accusing you :) I suppose I should have dug deeper. I'll try to find out who added the content to the original Pralay page and send them the same note I sent you yesterday.
- Best wishes, — riana_dzasta wreak havoc|damage report 02:46, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
- Oh great... an IP address! Now we'll never track them down... *sigh* Thanks for your cooperation, though. — riana_dzasta wreak havoc|damage report 02:48, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Inglewood Renaissance
I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Inglewood Renaissance, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Inglewood Renaissance. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. BlankVerse 00:06, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Scamdicapper
The article Scamdicapper has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 04:13, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Serious spamming: Final Warning
Dear "Professorgupta",
Please do not post any more external links on Wikipedia to sites you are linked with. The links were posted in a way forbidden by WP:EL and WP:COI often as false reference links, sometimes off very shallow articles whose only purpose is to support an external link. Please read these guidelines carefully. You have posted links as a minimum to onlineloanofficers.com shaadibliss.com onlineloanofficers.com crazysportsfan.com gurusofdating.com yourmoviepal.com presidentpolls2008.com amifobornot.com nflsystems.com camsfaq.com didbarrycheat.com lasvegasbuyeragent.com all of which appear to be linked to you. All of the links you have posted are now being reviewed and will be removed where inappropriate. The articles you have created are similarly being reviewed. In general we always try to assume good faith WP:AGF and so this is being posted as a final warning. However the scale of the links and abuse of guidelines is so wide (see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam#Reference_Spam.2C_8_Months_of_S.E.O. that someone may well decide your account should be blocked. Some of the sites are likely to be blacklisted as well. --BozMo talk 10:55, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
- I have proposed that the community ban you from the project for your campaign of spam. Your welcome to comment in your own defence on the administrator's noticeboard: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Community_ban_of_sneaky_spammer. If you have any questions feel free to contact me on my talk page or the admin noticeboard. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 16:57, 18 January 2007 (UTC)