Talk:Psi (parapsychology)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Neutral??
Just had a look at this article and it appears to indicate that psi is real, and not open to question, i.e. there is no representation of the sceptics viewpoint anywhere in the article.
I am particularly troubled by the use of the word neutral, in the sentence:
is a neutral term for parapsychological phenomena
I am going to put a few qualifiers in. Belbo Casaubon 19:18, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- This sense of the word neutral is that it does not indicate the content of the phenomenon. Actually, you changed it, then changed it back. I didn't really have a problem with the word "general." However, the whole intent of the word "psi" is to be neutral in the sense of not saying what the phenomenon is. Martinphi (Talk Ψ Contribs) 01:09, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- I changed it because it kinda looks like you used a chopped up version of someone elses words ( not a criticism), this article is in need of a complete rewrite to provide a NPOV standpoint. Belbo Casaubon 11:16, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
