Talk:Public speaking
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
It seems to me that the "Fundamentals of public speaking" are mainly just someone's opinion. Whose? --LMS
Contents |
[edit] Disagree with merge
I disagree with the merge, while linked, the two are separate concepts. This article can cover good public speaking technique and the public speaker can cover the "business" of public speaking, where many former politicians (it is a political stub afterall) or businessmen or whomever go on paid speaking tours. There is significant room to grow for both articles. Reflex Reaction 15:32, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Agreement with merge
Both pages are small and although there are differences the basic concept is simular if not exactly the same; surely the point of an artical is to expand on the basics. People are intelligent enough to distinguish between the two. Fuck you...
[edit] Agree with merge
Without public speaking, you have no public speakers. Without public speakers, you have no public speaking.
The concepts of each are the same, and both can be defined in one entry.
[edit] Disagree with merger
I think 'public speaking' should not be merged with 'public speaker', as the laters common applys to a certain amount of professional ability in the public speaker, and the former, of anyone who speaks in public.
[edit] Merger
Please sign all contributions!
[edit] Agree
They should be merged. One does not exist without the other.
Jonathan
[edit] Disagree
- Strong Disagree They are two entyirely separate articles.Frelke 07:53, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Disagree These topic are two completely seperate things, and it should be kept that way.Thepangelinanpost 23:01, 07 March 2006 (EST)
[edit] Disagree
Different concepts, Add see also to both pages.Ghostieguide 02:39, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Remove merge template
I have removed both the merge templates. There is no consensus and no real interest. Lets move on.Frelke 12:49, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] See also and Ext Links
I have just reverted the previous edits by TheTrueSora as as far as I could see the links seemed to have been trimmed at random. I'm not saying they were at random, just that it seemed that way to me. Could we have a bit of talk about what should go and what should stay ? Frelke 16:35, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
