User talk:PullToOpen
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome to my user talk page. If you want to leave me a message, please do so by clicking the + button near the "edit this page" tab or by clicking here. I will respond to discussions here. I'll respond to any message that doesn't sound as if it was written by a dick. I'll respond to any discussions on this page, so you might want to watch it for a while to see my response.
I like to keep my talk page as clear as possible, so don't be alarmed if there isn't anything on this page.
Contents |
Your RfA opening sentence
Your RfA opening sentence made me realise that I used the exact same opening sentence for both my RfA and RfB. Yours was similar to mine... but mine were identical! That's odd. Good luck, by the way :-) --Deskana (talk) 00:03, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Wow, I'm actually laughing pretty hard right now. I changed it at the last minute from "I'm going off the deep end", too... Cheers, PTO 00:07, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Impersonator
Hello. Thanks for blocking [User:Han Rachel] on Simple English Wikipedia. I browsed through the IP block list and some vandal (possibly a "Kate McAuliffe" vandal) impersonated both me and my sister. I knew that it was not my sister because I checked the contributions of this user and found an edit that no one in my family would do. Amos Han Talk 00:22, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Not a problem. We've had a long term vandal there who was obsessed with a girl named "Kate McAuliffe", so the name stuck. PTO 00:30, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- I know. I know who that long term vandal is. He is one of my classmates at my school. He is such a crazy person. I do agree that he is extremely obsessed with Kate McAuliffe. All I hear him say is "Sean McAuliffe has a beautiful sister" and "Wikipedia has a crush on Kate McAuliffe" and things like that. Hopefully he will stop doing that, now that I am extremely tired of hearing that. Amos Han Talk 01:03, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
RCU
You asked me to choose one single code letter in 2 RCU I made [1], [2]. I fulfilled your request, please do the check. Thanks.--MariusM 08:09, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- One has been declined, and the other completed. PTO 20:18, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
RfA thanks
 |
Thank you for your Support on my recent nomination for adminship, which passed with a final tally of 89/1/1. If there's anything I can help with, then you know where to find me. Cheers. - Michael Billington (talk) 10:41, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
|
Your RfA
Hi PullToOpen. I'll never place another inscrutable joke on an RfA again. Sorry. Xiner (talk, email) 15:38, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- No worries. I understood it the first time I saw it :). PTO 20:16, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Fool!
3RR Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. PTO 15:53, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
You guys are on 3 reverts im on two. You guys broke the rules go die! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by IAmTheCoinMan (talk • contribs).
- You have done three reverts. If you revert again, you will be blocked for violating the three revert rule. PTO 15:58, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
