R. v. Boucher
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
R. v. Boucher [1951] S.C.R. 265 is a famous Supreme Court of Canada decision where the Court overturned a conviction for sedicious libel on the grounds that criticizing the government was a valid form of protest.
[edit] Background
Aimé Boucher was a farmer in Beauce, Québec, and a practicing Jehovah's Witness. In 1951, he was arrested while distributing pamphlets entitled "Québec's Burning Hate for God and Christ and Freedom Is the Shame of all Canada" that criticized the Québec government suppression of the Witnesses and the courts for doing nothing to prevent. Boucher was charged for seditious libel - for endeavouring to promote public disorder - under section 133(2) of the Criminal Code.
At trial, the jury found Boucher guilty, which was upheld on appeal.
[edit] Opinion of the Court
In a 5 to 4 decision, the Court held that mere published of critical statements, without any intention to incite violence against the government, could not be seditious libel.
[edit] External link
 |
This article about Canadian law is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
