User:R9tgokunks/User:LUCPOL/5
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
The following is an historical 3RR report by LUCPOL in retaliation and Myself in original. It is taken from Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive35.
[edit] User:R9tgokunks reported by User:LUCPOL (Result: 24h)
Three-revert rule violation on . R9tgokunks (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log)
- Previous version reverted to: 11:45, December 20, 2006
- 1st revert: 18:37, December 27, 2006
- 2nd revert: 03:44, December 28, 2006
- 3rd revert: 20:27, December 28, 2006
- 4th revert: 00:30, December 29, 2006
- 5th revert: 02:02, December 29, 2006
Comments: User:R9tgokunks (Hrödberäht) vandalise (edit war, 3RR) arcicles: Metropolis, Upper Silesian Metropolitan Union, Ostrava, List of famous German Americans, Father of the Nation etc, etc. He's always revert. See history in arcicles (all edit war R9tgokunks vs all users in all arcicles): [1], [2], [3], [4], [5] etc. Please help. Please blocked this user on month (or more). LUCPOL 00:54, 29 December 2006 (UTC) PS: He manipulates, it lets old links (see highly - links discussion from... september etc). LUCPOL 00:54, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- First, please use the template provided. Second, you also violated 3RR in at least one of the articles. You're both violating 3RR, and if either of you get blocked, you both get blocked. --Wildnox(talk) 01:08, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
I will repeat. He leads many edit wars and 3RR! Not one or two - many. Please help (except Wildnox). LUCPOL 01:56, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- PS. This is data (links) with end of December 2006 (actually), I did not look for older. LUCPOL 02:00, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
How can the vandal get blocked, and the contributor who reverted the vandalism also get blocked? Surely this doesn't happen elsewhere on Wikipedia, does it?-- Hrödberäht 02:08, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
24h William M. Connolley 11:22, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] User:LUCPOL reported by User:R9tgokunks (Result: 24h)
Three-revert rule violation on . LUCPOL (talk · contribs · logs · block user · block log)
- Previous version reverted to: 11:45, December 20, 2006
- 1st revert: 20:59, December 27, 2006
- 2nd revert: 11:42, December 28, 2006
- 3rd revert: 20:58, December 28, 2006
- 4th revert: 00:40, December 29, 2006
- 5th revert: 02:50, December 29, 2006
Comments: Background on the situation(although it might be irrelevant to the actual report):[6],[7] [8],[9],[10] -- Hrödberäht 03:11, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
It is lie!: 1st revert - 27 December, 3rd and 5th revert is not revert. This is actualization. This is previous version [11], letter is reverts from R9tgokunks (Hrödberäht). I did not make 3RR: see: [12], [13] - My 3 corner edition and 3 reverts from R9tgokunks (Hrödberäht) - in draught 24h, 28 december 2006. I did not make 3 reverts, this is 3 corner edition. LUCPOL 03:12, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oh yes, just above the actual report is this further discussion-- Hrödberäht 03:22, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
Let me condense what I said above.(I Removed it) BOTH users appear to have violated 3RR on the article in question. --Wildnox(talk) 03:51, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Let me also add the suggestion that possibly instead of either or both of the users being blocked, that this and the other pages involved(listed by LUCPOL in the report above) be protected. This would allow the users to discuss their issue with eachother and hopefully come to a compromise. --Wildnox(talk) 04:44, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
24h William M. Connolley 11:24, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
