Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Toothpaste
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Toothpaste
Vote here (0/0/0) ending 01:00 October 31, 2005 (UTC)
Toothpaste (talk • contribs) – Toothpaste has three featured articles. Many admins have never worked on Featured Articles. She knows all about consensus and wikipedia processes. I remember one user... though I can't remember who... saying that they only support an RfA if the user has a featured article as it shows that they know consensus, process, what makes a great article, they gotta know about copyright, they gotta know how to cite sources, they got to be somewhat friendly (I've seen FAC's opposed just because the nominator was being somewhat of a dick). She also checks out books from her library before working on wikipedia. I cannot think of too many editors who use any source besides the internet for wikipedia... She's always seen around the pedia and she's got a great sense of humor. As for why her edits have decreased lately, it's because she's been playing around at the German and Japanese Wikipedias. Check her recent contributions you'll see merges and translations. She's an asset to more than one wikipedia. I think she's proved herself trustworthy, now give her the tools =D Redwolf24 (talk) 01:00, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: Toothpaste declined in IRC. Redwolf24 (talk) 01:10, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
Support
Oppose
Neutral
Comments
Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
- 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
- A.
- 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- A.
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A.
