Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Deepujoseph
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Username Deepujoseph
Distinct pages edited 3704
Average edits/page 2.549
First edit 00:49, October 28, 2005
Total edits 9442
(main) 4483
Talk 410
User 627
User talk 2609
Image 180
Image talk 1
Template 105
Template talk 27
Category 33
Category talk 1
Wikipedia 418
Wikipedia talk 107
Portal 404
Portal talk 37
Deepjoseph's edit count summary as at 05:53, 14 October 2006 (UTC) per Interiot's tool2 Glen 05:53, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Questions
I removed question 12 from the RfA for a few reasons. First, it is asking the editor to comment on the actions of other administrators on matters occuring during the RfA, which I think is unfair for the candidate. Secondly, the question just looks to me as veiled criticism of my opposition to trolling in the oppose section -- criticism that Clt13 (talk • contribs) already levied on my talk page. -- Samir धर्म 01:18, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- Well, I posted an optional question that I find relevant. The candidate can decide to answer or not to answer. So your first reason is no reason. The second seems okay; you were simply removing something that you consider is a criticism of your action. From your knee-jerk reaction, it seems you are more worried about the candidate deciding to answer it.Clt13 10:50, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- You asked an RfA candidate to comment on consequences of a vote on the same RfA. That is inappropriate for an RfA question -- Samir धर्म 23:53, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- I was not asking the candidate to comment on the consequences of a vote on the same RfA. I quoted it to show the context. I wanted to know, whether the candidate, who has been very polite and civil in all situations, will behave differently (like you) after he becomes an admin. A valid question, I think. It was an optional question. It is interesting to see that, you were the one( not the nominator, not any other participants in the RFA) who found it unfair on the candidate and removed. It seemed like a panic reaction. There as no need for that. Clt13 04:23, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- Q.E.D. You've just proved my point that your question was utterly inappropriate. Using questions on another's RfA to criticize my actions is unacceptable. An appropriate venue would be my invitation for an RfC still stands if you have issues. -- Samir धर्म 04:44, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- I was not asking the candidate to comment on the consequences of a vote on the same RfA. I quoted it to show the context. I wanted to know, whether the candidate, who has been very polite and civil in all situations, will behave differently (like you) after he becomes an admin. A valid question, I think. It was an optional question. It is interesting to see that, you were the one( not the nominator, not any other participants in the RFA) who found it unfair on the candidate and removed. It seemed like a panic reaction. There as no need for that. Clt13 04:23, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- You asked an RfA candidate to comment on consequences of a vote on the same RfA. That is inappropriate for an RfA question -- Samir धर्म 23:53, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Perhaps, in your system of logic A=A => A≠A Clt13 05:10, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
