Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Keetoowah/Evidence
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Warms my heart
The evidence on this page warms my heart. Editors who care so deeply about keeping article content that they err only in their edit commnents. Nothing inappropriate in the text! Don't get me wrong, I think Keetoowah should be admonished for his remarks, but certainly not punished in any way. He was preserving article content, first and foremost!
Sam Spade 21:47, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Keetoowah just can't get along with others
This user continually pushes his own pov on articles, sometimes with specious arguments, othertimes with overly long comments, other times he goes for direct insults and so on. I'm not sure just how the arbitration process works, so I'm posting thoughts here for discussion and will study up on arbitration. Arbitrators would please see Keetoowah's editing at Ward Churchill (many archives of discussion should be skimmed over); also observe his editing behaviour at Air America Radio. Summary-- Keetoowah does not seem at all interested in being part of the Wikipedia community, but rather he seems to view the project as an adversarily process in which he stuggles to win at, seemingly, at any cost. Calicocat 03:37, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
