Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/PSYCH
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I reject any notion that I should be blocked. I have peacefully editted wikipedia for 5 months. I do not engage in personal attacks. The examples that PSYCH brings are not personal attacks. Xtra 04:22, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
I would like some clarification from the arbitrators about whether we are actually debating content and accuracy of content and posts. There are numerous content based alegations that PSYCH has raised against me, which make up most of his response, which, though I am able to answer, I don't really have the time to prepare if it is not necessary. Issues of content include:
- PSYCH's allegation that because I support the Liberals I should not be allowed to edit related articles. Adam Carr, a Labor supporter, is a good example of a political supporter who's edits are generally above reproach. As I believe mine are.
- what is on the gay agenda.
- what the Liberals stand for and have done.
I can address all these if necessary. Xtra 03:51, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Problem Recurring?
I have a distinct feeling that this problem (or at least something related) has begun to recur.
This is the worst vandalism I've seen on Wikipedia. Ever. (though I'm not entirely an experienced Wikipedian).
