Talk:RGB color spaces
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is supported by the Color WikiProject.
This project provides a central approach to Color-related subjects on Wikipedia. |
 |
|
| Stub | This article has been rated as stub-Class on the quality scale. | ||
| Mid | This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale. | ||
|
Article Grading: |
|||
The external link "sRGB vs Adobe RGB: The Truth" (www.shootmaster.com) leads to a page which asks for registration. Is it the same content as it was at the time the link was added?
The external page RGB Working Space Information contains a more complete version of the table on this page with extra information about Volume, Lab Gamut Efficiency and Coding Efficiency. I think that these would be interesting pieces of data to add, but don't know how this should be done given that the table is currently from a book.
- Is there any copyright or other reason that this data can't be appended to the table? --Entirety 00:22, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] scRGB
scRGB should be added (an article about it, too). I think scRGB has even larger color gamut than the new Adobe space. I'm not a graphics professional, so somebody else could do that. --Ondrejsv 17:54, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Proposed rename
Unlike articles like sRGB color space, this article is not about a color space, whose name is RGB. Rather, it is about a number of color spaces, each from the RGB color model.
I believe the title of this article may help to reinforce the mistaken idea that there is a single color space called RGB. I therefore propose renaming it in the plural, "RGB color spaces" (with redirects sorted out and minor rewording). Seeing the plural in lists of color spaces should emphasise the point.
Comments. Notinasnaid 12:53, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- No comments? I'll go ahead then. I think this is one of those cases where violating the general rule in Wikipedia:Naming conventions#Prefer singular nouns is worthwhile. Notinasnaid 01:00, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
