User talk:Rmosler2100
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Dianetics mediation
Rmosler, if there are issues of bias regarding this mediation, I'd like to know your POV on the subject of religion and if you are a mediator. To make it fair I'll let you know I am a Scientologist. I am not a mediator, just helping to keep the discussion within context, in case that position is any problem to the mediation. --JimmyT 12:12, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
In response to your post of 07:41, 12 February 2006 on the Dianetics mediation page: what you suggest sounds like POV forking, and as such is not likely to be accepted by the other editors. Tenebrous 11:57, 12 February 2006 (UTC) The page dealing with forking and POV forking is a guideline, not official follow-it-to-the-letter-(or else!)-policy. I wouldn't go so far as to say that such a thing is wrong, but it's probably simpler to create one NPOV page than two separate NPOV pages. Tenebrous 13:34, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I don't know if you are interested, but the Dianetics issues continue. Have you seen the poll of "pseudoscience" on Dianetics (Talk) and ChrisO is going after Terryeo now with a Request for Comment. They have a list there of people who endorse what ChrisO says, and a place for outside comments from folks like me and you. Spirit of Man 02:42, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia_talk:Censorship
A watered-down version of the proposed policy against censorship is now open for voting. Will you kindly review the policy and make your opinions known? Thank you very much. Loom91 13:11, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Spelling of aberrant
I've made a few corrections of "abberant" to aberrant. This is not to detract from your excellent work.--Runcorn 10:17, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
