User talk:Roccoconon
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Image tagging for Image:Guitar drawing.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Guitar drawing.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:06, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:Guitarmusic.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Guitarmusic.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:09, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Vandalism
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you made to Werner Erhard, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Smee 17:04, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
-
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Werner Erhard. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Smee 17:13, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
-
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Werner Erhard, you will be blocked from editing. Smee 17:14, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
-
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Werner Erhard, you will be blocked from editing. Smee 17:26, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- I just checked the vandalize page on Wikipedia. The article states
-
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Werner Erhard, you will be blocked from editing. Smee 17:26, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
-
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Werner Erhard, you will be blocked from editing. Smee 17:14, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
However, significant content removals are usually not considered to be vandalism where the reason for the removal of the content is readily apparent by examination of the content itself, or where a non-frivolous explanation for the removal of apparently legitimate content is provided, linked to, or referenced in an edit summary. An example of blanking edits that could be legitimate would be edits that blank all or part of a biography of a living person.
Admittedly, in my initial edits I forgot to mention the reason for the edit in the Edit summary, but in subsequent edits I gave both reason and source. I noticed that you have quoted the full sentence from the article and hope this matter is now resolved.Roccoconon 18:03, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- It is. In the future do not remove sourced material from articles without consensus and discussion on talk pages. Thanks. Smee 18:11, 19 March 2007 (UTC).