Talk:Ron's Journal 67
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Scientology, a collaborative effort to help develop and improve Wikipedia's coverage of Scientology. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on Scientology-related topics. See WikiProject Scientology and Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ. |
|
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
Wiki policy includes "No Original Research." What is your verification for what appears at first glance to be your own, personal conclusion re: What RJ67 is about ? Terryeo 00:45, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
- Well it's an interpretation that I have made and that I share with others. I can try to find sources for it. I don't know of any other events in Hubbard mythology that happened 75 million years ago and that has been described in ways like that ("It's very likely to make you sick too", etc). This is also mentioned in the Xenu article (under Xenu in Scientology doctrine, which was not written by me). I certainly can't think of any other way to interpret it, but I can look for other sources if that will satisfy you. (Entheta 11:59, 31 December 2005 (UTC))
- Here are some more sources for you: [1], [2], [3]. (Entheta 12:26, 31 December 2005 (UTC))
-
- You simply can not read an author's words, interpret it to refer to Xenu and present to the reader that it does as a fact. That is OR on your part and not per wikipolicy. While I could give you an argument of what I think he referred to, it is really not germane because the more basic policy which we are to abide by, WP:OR applies. If he had used the word "Xenu" or "OT III" or any thing like that then you could include connected explanations to clarify what he said. But, Hubbard did not use words like that and it is OR to include your interpretation when he did not use those words. Terryeo 19:37, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
LRH did not use the term "secret society" in this tape, but referred to "fewer than 20 men" ... "about a dozen". Actually, these guys had quite high profiles in the newspapers in the 1960s. He linked them to the Mental Health or Mental Hygiene agencies which had spread, using taxpayer funding, through the English-speaking nations after World War 2; see World Federation for Mental Health. The connection to the "New World Order" is interesting, but needs a reference. DavidCooke 03:18, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
