Talk:Ron's Org
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Scientology, a collaborative effort to help develop and improve Wikipedia's coverage of Scientology. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on Scientology-related topics. See WikiProject Scientology and Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ. |
|
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
DavidCooke 05:22, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Some editing needed
At present this article presents what I take to be a Ron's Org slant on its own history which does not accord with the views of others. A couple of examples:
The definition of 'Standard Technology' is not that given in the Tech Dictionary, the word 'unaltered' has been added. This changes the emphasis to the Ron's Org view that the CoS has indeed 'altered' the writings of LRH. Of such single words are schisms made!
The possibility of LRH having died significantly earlier than claimed by the CoS is mentioned as though it is disputed. It was a rumour at the time but is not taken seriously now by anyone I know, particularly since Robert Vaughn Young who handled it left the CoS and became a prominent critic.
Not wishing to get into a revert war, is the original author or anyone else out there willing to debate this? --Hartley Patterson 23:53, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
