User talk:RSCPublishing
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] rsc.org
Your editing has spawned some talk at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemistry#RSC Publishing editing journal articles. Obviously, you appear to be affiliated with RSC Publishing. So long as your contributions follow the Wikipedia:Neutral point of view policy that should be fine, though there are concerns about your neutrality. Femto 14:10, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Category:Royal Society of Chemistry
I have created a category for RSC after noticing that there is now one for ACS. You may care to check whether I have missed adding any articles to the category, particularly journal articles. Note that journals should not be in Category:Scientific journals as well as Category:Chemistry journals, as the former is parent to the latter. I have corrected some cases of this. Also long ago I added all RSC journals to List of scientific journals in chemistry. Again you might care to check whether I have it right. BTW, I have no concerns about your neutrality. I think you are well keeping to the NPOV policy, but I can see that some people might worry about it. However, as a FRSC, I might not notice your POV! --Bduke 02:13, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Chemical Biology
I have changed all the links to the Journal, Chemical Biology to Chemical Biology (journal) so this is a red link. Maybe you can write the article. Note that Chemical Biology actually redirects to Biochemistry and that redirect occurs on one article. --Bduke 11:55, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Suggestions on Talk:Royal Society of Chemistry
Please take a look at these and comment. --Bduke 06:14, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Role accounts
Sorry, but I think you need to look at m:Role account. It seems that what you are doing is against the rules. I came across this at a discussion of User:Vcaaweb, a group of users doing what you are doing. It is discussed at Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board#"Official" edit to Victorian Certificate of Education by VCAA?. The discussion there is not unsymapthetic, as indeed has been the discussion of your joint account. I'm not sure what the best approach is. E-mail me from my user page if you want to discuss it. --Bduke 12:17, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Journals
I have now completed a trawl through all the RSC Journal articles and also added Education in Chemistry. I have removed what I consider to be POV comments and the section on "not for profit" which is seen as an advert. I have moved many external links to internal links. Most importantly I have added the tag asking for citations whenever there is an impact fact quoted. It is important that these statements are cited, both to give the date that impact factor was measured and also because it is a recognition of the journal from outside RSC. Many editors are cautious about all sources being internal to, in this case, the publisher of the journal. You have the details of this. Could you please add citations? A final question - is Catalysts and Catalysed Reactions really a journal? If not the journal category should be removed and it should be deleted from the list of scientific journals in chemistry. --Bduke 00:02, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Impact factors
Could you please add a source for the impact factors in the RSC journal articles? This is important as it will be the only non-RSC source for the notability of the journals. Some people are increasingly asking for this. You will probably know how to find these better than I can. If you do not know how to add references please ask me. --Bduke 08:33, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
