User talk:Sanchom
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
|
| Qxz Ads | file info – show another – #4 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| User | Talk | Archives | Contributions | A padlock |
 |
This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot III |
|---|---|
| Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived here. An index of the archives may be found here. |
[edit] West 49
Your changes did the trick. I've changed my vote to keep. Thanks, and good work! Realkyhick 16:48, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use
Regarding your question on the help desk: Don't forget that the logo template requires you to post a fair use rationale as detailed in Help:Image_page#Fair_use_rationale. - Mgm|(talk) 08:25, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the guidance. How does this look now: Image:West-49-logo.jpg? Sancho (talk) 15:52, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Twinkle
Thanks, I'll look into that. I certianly WANT to warn vandals, but doing it manually takes up way too much of my time, as I edit alot of pages everyday. Something like that would be a great help, if it does not place too much of a load on my old comp. THanks again.
- I tried it out on a vandal's edit, but I kept getting a script error. I'm running IE6 on WIn XP, so I'm guessing Twinkle is not ready for that browser. Do you know of a tool similar to Twinkle that works on IE, preferably IE6? My comp can't run IE7 without crashing at odd times, and I'm used to IE, really didn't like any other browser I've tried. Thanks. - BillCJ 05:14, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- Ah.. that's unfortunate. I just noticed that on the Twinkle page, it actually says that the scripts are only verified to work with Firefox and Opera. There are a few other scripts in the same category as Twinkle, but I haven't used them, so I don't know if they are as nice as I find Twinkle to be. They're listed here: Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit#Rollback scripts. It doesn't seem like they do the same kind of thing as Twinkle though. I asked the question at Wikipedia talk:Counter-Vandalism Unit#Twinkle-like script that works on Internet_Explorer. Hopefully somebody can point you in the right direction. The other obvious option is using Firefox, but that seems a bit much of a change just to get a script working. Sancho (talk) 05:31, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
THanks for checking on options for me anyway. If I have to, I could run Firefox simultaneously with IE, using IE for the majority of my edits. WHen I find a vandal's edit, I could copy the diff itno Firefox, and use the Twinkle features there. I'll try it out on my back-op OS, and see if it works the way I think it would. Still, I'd ratehr have something integrated with IE, but I guess we'll see what happens. Thanks again. - BillCJ 06:02, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Minor Information
If you haven't already sent a request for oversight e-mail: If you don't have time, I'll make it easier for you: E-mail me the user page and I will find the diffs and submit it for you. --TeckWiz ParlateContribs@ 02:38, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for your offer. I just sent the e-mail. I included the original diff that added the information, and another diff that updated the information. Is that the best thing to do? Sancho (talk) 02:45, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
