Talk:Satana (Marvel Comics)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is in the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! Edit the article attached to this page or discuss it at the project talk page. Help with current tasks, or visit the notice board. | ||
| ??? | This article has no rating on the quality scale. Please rate the article and provide comments here. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's importance scale. | ||
Contents |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS to move page at this time, per discussion below. -GTBacchus(talk) 20:03, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Requested move
Satana (Marvel Comics) → Satana — The only other article to use this name is Satana (India). Though I don't know a great deal about this Indian village, it's notability would seem to be questionable. I believe the Marvel Comics character should have priority. PC78 17:41, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Survey
- Add # '''Support''' or # '''Oppose''' on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
[edit] Survey - Support votes
- Support, as nominator. PC78 17:42, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Survey - Oppose votes
- Oppose I would prefer to see the disambiguation page at the main slot. I don't think there's strong evidence that any of the possible Satana articles would be the most-likely-to-be-sought, thereby making it a more sensible choice. GassyGuy 22:20, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose (moved from WP:RM, Patstuarttalk|edits 19:58, 5 January 2007 (UTC)) A disambiguation page is probably the best choice here, so that we don't have ongoing concerns about whether a relatively minor comic book character is more important than other uses of the word. -/- Warren 12:29, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose - as above -- Beardo 05:55, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
- Add any additional comments:
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
