Searches incident to a lawful arrest
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
![]() |
Criminal procedure |
---|
Investigating and charging crimes |
Criminal investigation |
Arrest warrant · Search warrant |
Probable cause · Knock and announce |
Exigent circumstance |
Search and seizure · Arrest |
Right to silence · Miranda warning (U.S.) |
Grand jury |
Criminal prosecution |
Statute of limitations · Nolle prosequi |
Bill of attainder · Ex post facto law |
Criminal jurisdiction · Extradition |
Habeas corpus · Bail |
Inquisitorial system · Adversarial system |
Charges and pleas |
Arraignment · Indictment |
Plea · Peremptory plea |
Nolo contendere (U.S.) · Plea bargain |
Presentence Investigation |
Related areas of law |
Criminal defenses |
Criminal law · Evidence |
Civil procedure |
Portals: Law · Criminal justice |
In the United States citizens are protected by the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution against unreasonable search and seizure. In most cases, a search warrant is required to perform a lawful search. An exception to this requirement is searches incident to a lawful arrest. This is also known as the Chimel Rule after the case that established it, Chimel v. California. This rule permits an officer to perform a warrantless search during or immediately after a lawful arrest. This search is limited to only the person arrested and the area immediately surrounding the person in which the person may gain possession of a weapon or destroy or hide evidence.[1]
[edit] References
- ^ O'Connor, T (05/15/06). Retrieved August 14, 2006, from SEARCH AND SEIZURE: A GUIDE TO RULES, REQUIREMENTS, TESTS, DOCTRINES, AND EXCEPTIONS Web site: http://faculty.ncwc.edu/toconnor/405/405lect04.htm