Talk:Seaside resort
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Repetition
Nearly the whole of this article is about Brighton. Yet there's an article called Brighton! However, if the Brighton stuff is removed or transferred, there will be nothing left. Can someone cleverer than me correct this? - Adrian Pingstone 21:07, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Cancel the above. I've realised its only half Brighton so I'll do the job myself - Adrian Pingstone 21:14, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Case for mentioning Brighton, Newquay, Southwold and Blackpool.
Hi,
My intention was to develop the point of the current state of British seaside resorts, through several examples, only one of which (Brighton) had been written so far. I think that resorts which have broken the cliched mould, such as Brighton, Newquay and Southwold, all of which have sought to project a notion of unique character, have relevance here and should indeed be mentioned, along with Blackpool, which championed the traditional resort concept so successfully and for so long. Note that the Brighton page does not seek discuss the relative merits of the city as a 'resort'.
What do you think?
- I suggest summarising these different approaches in an expanded article. Specific case studies are best placed in the individual city articles. Warofdreams 13:18, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
-
- Will do, thanks for the advice. Vinoir 16:49, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
