User talk:Shac1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Augsburg-Capella issue

I'm still not following your logic on removing the point on the Augsburg-Capella relationship. The summer courses of Augsburg College, and this is according to Augsburg, are now done in conjunction with Capella (which is headquartered only a mile away). How is this similar to any other program the for-profit school may claim (JC, military or otherwise), and what reasons are there for legitimate removal? --Bobak 22:26, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Capella University has the same type of relationships with numerous other colleges and universities - this is revealed by simple Internet searches on similar alliances - the Augsburg-Capella relationship is not unique, by any means, and is therefore irrelevant to an article related specifically to Capella. I don't understand why the physical distance between the two has any meaning. I also don't understand your logic as to why the Augsburg-Capella relationship is different than any of the others that Capella has formed and which would justify both its importance and inclusion for the entry. The links I posted on the article to some of the hundreds of alliances between Capella and various entities (on Capella's web site, no less) should have been more than sufficient to help those interested in Capella's "alliances" to find more information. Why is Augsberg so special? --Shac1 23:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

So we don't have to keep repeating each reply, I'm going to make my main reply on the Capella discussion page. --Bobak 23:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 3RR

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Capella University. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 04:53, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Other user continues to vandalise Capella University article. Unless it is stopped, arbitration will be requested. Shac1 04:55, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Please see Wikipedia:Vandalism and Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. arbitration should always be a last resort. I have posted about what is going on at the article at the incident board for review.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 04:57, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

I had also posted information about the ongoing vandalism by other users (including those made using a Capella University IP address on the talk page). Furthermore, the ongoing personal attacks by other users are unacceptable. Shac1 05:02, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2007

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Capella University. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please read WP:3RR. RJASE1 02:45, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

My warning was not vandalism - please stop the reverting while I figure out what's going on. If my warning was unjust, I will remove it. RJASE1 02:51, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I believe your warning is vandalism. I appropriately posted a request to move things to the Capella talk page [[1]] and requested assistance from Wikipedia administrators on the incident board. Furthermore, I'm getting really tired of the personal attacks by individuals who appear to be employeed by Capella University. Shac1 02:56, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

I am truly a neutral party - give me a couple of minutes to look over the dispute so I can recommend a path forward - right now you guys are going in circles. RJASE1 03:00, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

I don't have the expertise to solve your problem - please take your dispute to WP:RFC. RJASE1 03:09, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

I would like to ask for your assistance in setting up the Request for Comment (RfC) pertaining to Capella University as the Capella user(s) who continue to delete valid criticisms engage in personal attacks.Shac1 03:15, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Trying to figure out the best section for this dispute - probably this one. In the WP:RFC#instructions, it tells you how to set up the discussion. RJASE1 03:23, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Question - Does the RfC get placed at the bottom of the article's current page? Furthermore, the article has now been locked and placing the RfC there is not possible. Shac1 03:28, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

It should be on the article's talk page. RJASE1 03:29, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Okay. It also appears as if the new anon. user is merely one of those who was previously vandalizing articles. That information may be found at: [User 68:117:38:94] It is reasonable to assume that this same individual has merely found another computer to continue the edit war. As I have not done a RfC before, I'll try to set it up in a short while. Hopefully, it will go smoothly. Shac1 03:34, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

When the dispute is resolved, you can request that the page be un-protected at WP:RPP. RJASE1 03:49, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

A RfC has been created on the [talk page]Shac1 04:56, 10 February 2007 (UTC)