Talk:Shi'a view of Ali
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Shi'a Islam, a WikiProject related to the Shi'a Islam. It has been rated B-Class on the quality scale. |
 |
This article was nominated for deletion on 14 May 2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 2006-08-14. The result of the discussion was keep in some form. |
Comment: This might not be necessary if consensus is reached to merge all the "Shia view" articles back into their corresponding main article. For more discussion on this point see here. Zunaid 08:27, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
- No, i dont agree on mergin all. The Umar view is way to large to be merged.--Striver 14:05, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Backing off in the face of injustice?
I'm against this page. Why should Zora dictate what is factual and what is not, based on her western understanding of Islam? How in the world does this Shia antagonist get the authority to decide what goes on the main Ali page as standard reference?
This page only is valid if there is a similar page Sunni view on Ali ibn Abi Talib and Western Academic view on Ali ibn Abi talib.--Zereshk 20:56, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
- Done: Non-Muslim view of Ali and Sunni view of Ali --Striver 01:07, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Expand
There is so incredibly much to add to the Shi'a view, do it if you have the time! --Striver 01:25, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
