From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Films, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to films and film characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
|
Editing Guidelines |
Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article:
- If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film)
- When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references.
- Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film.
|
|
|
|
This article is part of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |

Star Trek Portal |
[edit] Armament "vice-versa"
With regards to the Scimitar's armament of "over 50 disruptor banks and over 20 Photon Torpedo bays", what does "or vice-versa" mean? Was this unclear in the movie and/or book? Were there contradictions between references? -- Jeff Q 06:41, 9 May 2004 (UTC)
- I believe Worf's line was, "52 disruptor bank, 25 photon torpedo launchers," though I could be wrong on the latter of the two. And the former.
- Regardless, Worf clearly states both numbers when the Scimitar decloaks in the film. - Hayter 13:22, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Tom Cruise
(Jude Law and Michael Shanks had also auditioned for the role).
First I've heard of it and I'm a pretty big geek. Is there a source to back this up or is it just standard fan guesswork? It's not uncommon before a Trek film begins filming for fans to circulate rumours that are completely false, and it's also been known for those rumours to be accepted as truth later on. That may have happened here. - Hayter 16:18, 2 December 2005 (UTC)