Talk:Shuttle Landing Facility
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Merger
I would suggest that, per Naming Conventions, we merge NASA Shuttle Landing Facility into Shuttle Landing Facility rather than the other way around. - more common usage, unneccisary disambiguation --GW_Simulations|User Page | Talk | Contribs | E-mail 19:26, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
- I redirected the Shuttle Landing Facility page into the NASA Shuttle Landing Facility page, so we don't need a merge. Bigtop 19:14, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was no move, since there seems to be no particular clamour for it and the current title is unambiguous. Guy 08:48, 13 September 2006 (UTC) NASA Shuttle Landing Facility → Shuttle Landing Facility – (Over redirect with history)Simple WP:NC, it is called Shuttle Landing Facility, and most commonly reffered to as this. GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 22:01, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Survey
Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
[edit] Discussion
Add any additional comments
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was PAGE MOVED per reasonable and well-argued request, previous request was unopposed. If somebody objects, let them say so and we can talk about it then. -GTBacchus(talk) 00:24, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Requested move
NASA Shuttle Landing Facility → Shuttle Landing Facility — WP:NC states that the most common form should be used. This is clearly Shuttle Landing Facility not NASA Shuttle Landing Facility. If you look at the pages that link here, then, excluding those that link through , most link to Shuttle Landing Facility. A quick Google search confirms this - 655 results for the phrase NASA shuttle landing facility [1] vs 92,100 for shuttle landing facility[2]. Sadly, Shuttle Landing Facility has a history, so I cannot move this myself. Note: my last request for this move was unopposed, however it was never implemented. GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 20:47, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Survey
- Add * '''Support''' or * '''Oppose''' on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
[edit] Discussion
- Add any additional comments:
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.