Talk:Singapore Airlines Flight 006
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
 An attempt to better coordinate and organise articles related to Singapore. To participate, simply edit this page or visit our noticeboard for more info. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. |
Due to a "broken link" on another page, I created this stub. Then, on another list, I discovered Singapore Airlines Flight 6. I fixed the link, now this article needs to be deleted. 216.164.138.57 13:33, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
Hi, this is for the unknown editor who made changes on 1 Feb 06. IMHO, the insertions you made under 'Aftermath' should either be put in 'Findings' or 'Controversy', since they relate directly to the accident investigation and the controversy that ensued.
I am also concerned about the last 2 paragraphs you have inserted in 'Aftermath'. The paragraph quote "The SQ6 Captain , thought that the green centerline... runway edge lights for guidance in low visibility conditions." unquote is from Pg 135 of the ASC's final report and the paragraph quote "About 2245 on October 23, 2000, a MD-11 freighter had been given clearance to taxi... MD-11 Captain was conducted on Feb 16, 2001, and a second interview was conducted on July 19, 2001, at ASC headquarters." is from Pg 149 of the same report. Both paragraphs are almost verbatim copies, with small changes for readability.
I am no copyright guru but I think there is a cause for concern with regards to the last 2 paragraphs. I would suggest either to rewrite the paragraphs with minimal quotes or remove them altogether, as the ASC report is not public domain.Neofaun 14:20, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
