Talk:Site map
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Does someone want to mention the position with Wikipedia and its Site map, or lack there of. The best reference Ive found is probably the page Special:Allpages
I think google sitemap detail is being too much highlighted. Suppose other search engine owner see this they would probably highlight their details and this page could become a war zone.... I'm probably going to do something about this. What do you all think?
War is good in this case. invariably they will expand the page.
about the "The basic premise is that some sites have a large number of pages that are only available through the use of forms and user entries." is a litte bit misguiding.
how exactly can you point a crawler bot to a page if it's the result of a from's POST?
IMHO, the google site map is merely a way to do the oposite of the robots.txt. to include pages, instead of exclude. It's totaly biased on the data google needs instead of really being a sitemap. for example, there no title! a site map of urls without a title! but there's a hint for relevancy.
for me, it's merely a "google pasive site submission"
[edit] limitations
Changed limitations to sitemap for very large website to a benefit. It is easier for a robot to crawl a sitemap than a lot of pages. Acaciz 13:44, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
