User talk:SmokeyJoe
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
SmokeyJoe talk page
Contents |
[edit] Copyright violation
The article in no way prevents Rowling from profiting from or furthering her success from the series. It's merely a synopsis and commentary on the character. There are no text lifts or reprints of copyrighted material. Using your guidelines, most of the HP articles could be deleted. John Reaves 08:37, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- I was refering to the HP articles on Wikipedia, most of them are the same or similar. In fact, many of the articles at the Harry Potter Wiki or direct copies that have been "dewikipediafied". So using your logic, the articles here, at Wikipedia, should be delted as well. John Reaves 14:41, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello Smokey Joe. Just thought I'd make you aware of Wikipedia:Deletion review, in case you still want to carry on the discussion. It is not difficult at all to restore deleted pages, and that's what Deletion review is for. --Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 17:20, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Potter in translation series
Hi SmokeyJoe. The article was deleted because of the deletion nomination, which you can find here. The consensus was vastly in favour of deletion. See Wikipedia:Why was my article deleted? for further advice. If you are unhappy with the decision, please see Deletion review for information on how to appeal. Proto::► 14:06, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Yellow Eyes and Russian Blue
Helo, I saw the comment on the rewording of Russian Blue having Yellow Eyes. Although I agree with your rewording, I am wondering if you have a source proving that yellow eyes are an imperfection found only in non-pedigrees. If you can prove this, I would like to see it, becasue my russian blue had yellow eyes, and he was a pure bred. Thanks. --Emevas 06:41, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Just so you know: here's a picture of the cat:
Ozy, 2 1/2 years old male Russian Blue
Thanks! --Emevas 06:54, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Well, it's actually a fact that purebred parents can carry genes to cause imperfections. In fact, purebreds have been bred so often, the animals have actually lost a lot of intelligence. --TylerMcBride 13:53, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Why don't you find a reliable citation for that fact and add your information to Cat breed. SmokeyJoe 02:04, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Right thing
Yes, because now the ongoing discussion is in one location rather than two. >Radiant< 12:15, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Autoblocked
user:CanadianCaesar, were you overzealous in autoblocking 129.78.64.106 due to the actions of user:Moosethemoose?
[edit] Advisement on Good Faith and Civility
SmokeyJoe, I ask that you please comply with the wikipedia policies of Assuming Good Faith Wikipedia:Assume_good_faith and Civility Wikipedia:Civility.--Fahrenheit451 16:28, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Credential Verification
I have replied to your kind message on my talkpage. Any particular reason why you invited me specifically? William Connolley is probably the chap you need more than anyone. JFW | T@lk 22:14, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- I asked you specifically because I see your edits and contributions a lot. I read far more pages than I edit. Your contributions are of very high quality and are clearly grounded in your expertise. You don't seem to engage much in wiki-policies, and I thought to ask you directly about Jimbo's proposal. I think the opinion of an expert is extremely relevent regarding a policy that would apply specifically to experts. SmokeyJoe 09:13, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
