Talk:Snaefell Mountain Railway

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

See also: WikiProject Trains to do list

Start

This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. (assessment comments)

Low

This article has been rated as low-importance within the Trains WikiProject.

Selected

This article was displayed as the Portal:Trains "Selected article" for week 20, 2006.

This article is maintained by WikiProject UK Railways.

A Wikipedian removed Snaefell Mountain Railway from the good article list after consensus was reached to do so. There are suggestions below for improving areas to satisfy the good article criteria. Once the objections are addressed, renominate the article as a good article. If you disagree with the objections, you can seek a review.

Article Milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 23, 2005	Good article nominee	Listed
April 6, 2007	Good article review	Delisted
Current Status: Delisted good article

[edit] Grade?

What is steepest grade of this line?

Syd1435 23:01, 2004 Nov 7 (UTC)

[edit] GA Re-Review and In-line citations

Members of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles are in the process of doing a re-review of current Good Article listings to ensure compliance with the standards of the Good Article Criteria. (Discussion of the changes and re-review can be found here). A significant change to the GA criteria is the mandatory use of some sort of in-line citation (In accordance to WP:CITE) to be used in order for an article to pass the verification and reference criteria. Currently this article does not include in-line citations. It is recommended that the article's editors take a look at the inclusion of in-line citations as well as how the article stacks up against the rest of the Good Article criteria. GA reviewers will give you at least a week's time from the date of this notice to work on the in-line citations before doing a full re-review and deciding if the article still merits being considered a Good Article or would need to be de-listed. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact us on the Good Article project talk page or you may contact me personally. On behalf of the Good Articles Project, I want to thank you for all the time and effort that you have put into working on this article and improving the overall quality of the Wikipedia project. LuciferMorgan 00:32, 13 December 2006 (UTC)