User talk:Sophiesorbonne
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- You're welcome! And speaking of welcome, here's a welcome message to help you get started as a new Wikipedian:
Welcome!
Hello, Sophiesorbonne, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --AbsolutDan (talk) 17:52, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] reasons for revert in Satyabrata Rai Chaowdhuri
Can you give me any reason for stating that this perosn is one of the most prominent schoalrs in South Asian studies today? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rimibchatterjee (talk • contribs) 08:02, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Kindly meet the renowned scholars of South Asian Studies at home and abroad and ask for their opinion about Rai Chowdhuri. Then if you have any further questions please come with that. I will be happy to face your question.
Sincere regards
Sophie, France. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sophiesorbonne (talk • contribs) 08:22, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Removing comments on article discussion page
It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed content from Talk:Satyabrata Rai Chowdhuri. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. --AbsolutDan (talk) 20:35, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Thank you. I do understand. But the discussion was regarding reviews which do not exist anymore. So is there any justification for this comment to be here at all?Sophiesorbonne 05:28, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, even if the work has been completed, the comment should remain "on the record". The only time that information should be removed from a talk page is if it is archived, is a personal attack, or if it is completely off-topic. --AbsolutDan (talk) 12:59, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Professor Rai Chaudhuri
I am sorry if you were offended about my comment. My intention was not at all to cast aspersions on Professor Rai Chaudhuri's scholarship nor his standing; I simply felt that the article did not do him justice and was phrased in too vague and unsupported a manner to give a real sense of his achievements. I am well aware of his standing and was concerned that those outside India who do not know his name would not come away with an accurate idea of his contributions. My efforts to clean up the phrasing had that objective. The present article is fine although the addition of a select bibliography would be nice. The previous one duplicated a lot of stuff that had been syndicated around the world, and it was hard to find things in it. best regards --- Rimi 15:23, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Sophiesorbonne, if you have some time and resources, how about adding a section to Satyabrata Rai Chaudhuri's page regarding his major theories, findings and books? Thanks
Rimi talk 09:36, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] The Psychology Wiki
Hi Sophiesorbonne! This is Jaywin from The Psychology Wiki. I was wondering if you'd be interested in taking a look at the Psychology Wiki. If you'd like, check out our mission statement. If this project looks interesting to you, feel free to set up a user page. We'd certainly appreciate any contributions that you would be willing to make. Have a good one! EPM 22:08, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] License tagging for Image:Sir Satyabrata.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Sir Satyabrata.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:09, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] License tagging for Image:Rai Chowdhuri.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rai Chowdhuri.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:10, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
