User talk:Sovex
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] C-Tec
Thanks for the info on Wikiproject: Albums - I adapted it's guide for Ashtrayhead (album), another project by Marc Heal (of Cubanate and... C-Tec fame). Tell me what you think about it, if you care... JM.Beaubourg 01:54, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
-
- Nice work! I'm actually a big fan of Ashtrayhead (well, Marc Heal in general). It's nice to have other contributors on here that wish to expand the information on this genre! Sovex 18:36, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Proposed deletion
I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article C-Tec, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Importance). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:C-Tec. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Steven Fruitsmaak | Talk 13:27, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
-
- Unfortunately, I did not see this before the article was deleted. If it is possible to un-delete it, I feel this step should be taken. I don't understand why C-tec would not be considered notable enough to have their own article. They fall well within the bounds of importance, as defined by Wikipedia:WikiProject_Music/Notability_and_Music_Guidelines. Primarily, the band consists of members of Cubanate and Front 242, both of whom are unarguably notable. If it is not too late, this deletion should surely be reconsidered, and I do not think that it should be deleted simply because I have been unable to check my messages, and therefore couldn't argue for it. Sovex 19:46, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
-
- I'm sorry but I was unable to decide from the article that it was notable. But you provide good arguments so I agree it should be undeleted. I've requested so here and here. You being unable to argue is indeed a reason for speedy undeletion. I'm sorry it got deleted (don't take it personal) and hope it is restored soon and you don't resent me for proposing it -I acted in good faith. Keep up the good work!--Steven Fruitsmaak | Talk 10:14, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Steven, thank you for the response Sovex 16:13, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
-
-
