Talk:Stan Collymore

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.

Biography Portal

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

1 External links
2 External links
3 Domestic abuse against Ulrika Jonsson
4 Career after Villa?

[edit] External links

Were removed earlier, here's an archive of them.

[edit] External links

[edit] Domestic abuse against Ulrika Jonsson

Domestic abuse against Ulrika Jonsson

Stan Collymore spent many days on tabloid front pages in 1998, after it was revealed he was the perpetuator of domestic abuse against his former girlfriend Swedish-born British television presenter Ulrika Jonsson. Jonsson later took out an injunction preventing Collymore from releasing a sex tape involving the two, apparently made while they were on holiday in Jamaica - the video was later destroyed by Collymore. The incident damaged his image if not his football career. ^[1] —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Saguamundi (talk • contribs) 20:46, 3 March 2007 (UTC).

That this happened is not disputed. However, user User:Theliksta persists in removing this from the article. These removals seem to be Theliksta's only contributions to Wikipedia, interestingly. I've reinstated it again, with a request that we discuss here rather than having to protect the page etc. --Oscarthecat 06:15, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

As per WP:BLP, negative statements (which you can take to mean "anything that could get us sued") should not be included in the article unless we can source them. Whether I, personally, accept that it happened is not relevant here; if it's well-documented, then come up with a source that you can cite in the article. I don't want to be a jerk about this, but we do have to be responsible about what we say. DS 14:11, 4 April 2007 (UTC)