Talk:Stephanie Plum
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(result of AfD)
[edit] Series or character?
During the AfD discussion, the point of whether the article should be about the series or its main character has been raised. I continue the discussion here because AfD should be for discussing about deletions. Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 11:13, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Stephanie_Plum
- The guideline uses "work of fiction" to refer to either a book or a series of books (see the second example in WP:FICT, which is a main character in a series). That the title of the article could be Stephanie Plum is not unreasonable (since there seems to be quite a consensus about keeping with moving I will not further object to that). However, in this case there is no point in having also an article Stephanie Plum Series, so this article should cover both the series and its main character, not only the main character. That makes no such a big difference but, for example, the books are the subject of the article and not a set of "References". Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 11:13, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Failed AFD
See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephanie Plum. Johnleemk | Talk 18:50, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Sequence of Books?
The series includes two books that Evanovich refers to as "Between the Numbers", Plum Lovin' (which follows Twelve Sharp) and Visions of Sugar Plums (which follows Hard Eight). The works are considered by the author to be outside of the main story arc, but released in the correct sequence. Fans have noted that some plot points come up in the novels but they aren't required to follow the next book, though, this is really true for any in the series.
Currently the infobox for Hard 8 lists To The Nines as it's follow up. Should Visions be listed instead? Should the template for the books be edited to move the "Between The Numbers" novels into a seperate listing? Aristan 02:45, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
