Talk:Steve Lamacq
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Sorry about the Libra thing. I just put that there as an excuse to add a facetious link. People can leave it or remove it, I'm not fussed. Not a bad article, now, is it? Links and everything, very cool- elmsyrup
- Yep, very good, elmsyrup. So do you like this place? You can do some other articles if you want... :) -- Oliver P. 18:33 Feb 5, 2003 (UTC)
I know, it isn't a bad place at all. But I don't have many fields of expertise... elmsyrup
- Oh, you don't have to be an expert at anything. You just need to always know at least one thing that hasn't been covered yet. And even if you don't know anything, you can always look stuff up. ;) -- Oliver P. 10:52 Feb 9, 2003 (UTC)
[edit] Lurpak
From what I can remember, Peel always used to refer to Lamacq as "Lammo" and it was Mark and Lard who referred to him as "Steve Lurpak". Is this correct, or did Peelie start the "Lurpak" thing?
-Zagrebo 18:17, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
- I think you're right, I remember Peel calling him Lammo --MartinUK 16:14, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
-
- I'm going to change the nickname to "Lammo" since I'm sure this is correct. - Zagrebo 21:22, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- IIRC it (Lurpak) was a Chris Moyles afternoon show thing they conjured up one day during a link after a trailer for the evening session (on reflection realising how long ago that was i really do feel old now!)160.5.247.8 01:08, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thinking about it again, it might have been "Prince of Peanuts" ... 160.5.247.8 01:10, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- IIRC it (Lurpak) was a Chris Moyles afternoon show thing they conjured up one day during a link after a trailer for the evening session (on reflection realising how long ago that was i really do feel old now!)160.5.247.8 01:08, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
-