User talk:Stuedgar
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
Unblock : I have no knowledge of any user encroaching on my IP address, have never heard of the offending user, have shown myself as a friend and contributer to the project on numerous occasions and futhermore have no reason in the slightest for either instigating vandalism or being punished for it. Regards, --Stuedgar 23:22, 5 December 2006 (UTC)stu
[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Torm Asia.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Torm Asia.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 01:20, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your recent edits
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Russell Brand page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. J Di 16:37, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Joe Jacks
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Joe Jacks, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ... discospinster talk 22:43, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
