Talk:Sue v Hill
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Sue v Hill is maintained by WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. | ||
| A | This article has been rated as A-class on the quality scale. | ||
| Mid | This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale. | ||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Australian law. | ||
|
Assessment comments
This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|||
 |
An entry from Sue v Hill appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on May 21, 2006. |
 |
[edit] Forgive My Ignorance But . . .
Shouldn't this be Sue vs Hill? -WarthogDemon 19:03, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- It's my understanding that court cases are "v.", not "vs". As it stands, this page is missing the period after the v. See Brown v. Board of Education for an example. -- RattleMan 19:05, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- Didn't notice that. Odd. Well, thanks for clearing that up for me. ^^; -WarthogDemon 19:09, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- It's "v." (with a period) in the United States; but for Australian cases the WikiProject Australian law has decided to simply follow the Australian Guide to Legal Citation, which uses "v" without a period, and not "v." or "vs". --bainer (talk) 00:55, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
-
