Talk:Superfund
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was move. —Nightstallion (?) 11:00, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Proposed move to Superfund
- Oppose the move. "Superfund" may be unambiguous within the US environmental community, but for the general WP readership it is just a general term. Besides it is not the official name of the program, and there is at least one other "Superfund": see "Superfund (disambiguation)". In fact, Superfund should be (or redirect to) the disamb article. Jorge Stolfi 15:11, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- Support. From Google:
- Results 1 - 10 of about 444 for "Superfund Investment Group"
- Results 1 - 10 of about 330,000 for +Superfund +Austria -epa -environment.
- Results 1 - 10 of about 6,720,000 for +Superfund +EPA.
- Results 1 - 10 of about 5,640,000 for +Superfund +environment.
- Results 1 - 10 of about 3,980,000 for +Superfund +toxic.
- —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 16:02, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- Support The EPA use is overwhelmingly the most common. older ≠ wiser 02:24, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit] List of superfunds
Should we set up a list of Superfund sites, with information about each one? Chadlupkes 04:58, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
- I don't see a problem with that, though it should definetly be in a seperate page (with a link to it from here, and a small paragraph describing it, of course). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.194.72.243 (talk • contribs) 12:23, April 24, 2006.
-
- Well, there are over a thousand of of them, and looking at the list, many of them aren't really noteworthy (example: ENVIROCHEM CORP. ZIONSVILLE, IN). I think a category for existing sites would be appropriate. A full list would be silly. A list of noteworthy Superfund sites, including major sucesses should be included on this page. Cacophony 05:59, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
