User talk:SuperWikiman
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hi. We've replied to your claims at Talk:Ceremonial counties of England. Morwen - Talk 14:39, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
Thank you.
Contents |
[edit] Greetings from Belle Center (sort of)
Hi John! Good to run into you by accident: I was looking at the Ben Logan article when I noticed your name coming up :-) Nathaniel Pockras 04:03, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- My father's father, a Christian, is a Jewish convert. My ancestors there are all Ukrainian Jews. My grandmother and my mom's parents are not at all ethnically Jewish. Nyttend 13:18, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] mraar
Ever consider categorising your userboxes? D:
By the way, I think you deserve the ubx-5 box more than I do. ._o Blast 11.17.06 1318 (UTC -5) 
- Hope you don't mind, but I took the liberty of making a table out of your userboxes. A link to the most recent edit before this is here. Blast 11.29.06 0359 (UTC -5)
[edit] Your age
Hey John, how can you be 15-3/2? Nyttend 01:50, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiSk template
Hello,
I have recently founded a template which can be used on their user pages by those, who contribute to the Slovak Wikipedia as well. If you do and if you are interested, you can have a look at Template:User wikisk. Jan.Kamenicek 22:49, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re: new article
If you look at your new congressman article, you'll find that I categorised it for you :-) I don't do much in the way of new articles in general, but I had a big exception a month ago when I created several hundred articles for townships and small towns across Ohio, as well as the navigational template that you'll find at the bottom of the article for any town or township in Ohio. Nyttend 01:58, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- You praised all my pictures. Here's something you can do: if you have (1) a digital camera, and (2) a chance to do it, take a good still picture of BLHS for the article. Nyttend 02:58, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Please don't remove things.
Hi John,
I must ask in the future that you please do not remove parts of articles that are factually accurate, like you did in the Get Fuzzy subsection about the Pittsburgh controversy. The thing you removed actually appeared in the strip. Please don't do that in the future, because that borders on vandalism. Other than that, keep up the good work. --ChrisP2K5 03:27, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
