Talk:Telephone Number Mapping
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was no move, as the request is old and forgotten. Please take to WP:RM. Patstuarttalk|edits 00:32, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Electronic Numbering → ? – Title is inaccurate, it should be determined which title is correct so it can be moved. The most likely candidate is blocked by a redirect page created when it was moved, then for some reason moved back again.
- Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
[edit] Discussion
- Add any additional comments
[edit] Support
I have felt for a long time that the term "electronic number" is misleading and have first-hand experience explaining to someone how ENUM is related to VoIP, but not required to make VoIP work simply because of this incorrect terminology. WirelessMike 05:02, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Oppose
- Short for 'enumerated' which can be set types in multiple programming languages.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit] Grammar
- I'm really not sure where this should be noted, but the word "biunivocally" is not in the dictionary. Humorously enough, "univocal" is in the dictionary, and the definition from Meriam Webster: "1 : having one meaning only, 2 : UNAMBIGUOUS".
n.
