Talk:The Beautiful People
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
The Beautiful People (reviewed version) has been listed as a good article under the good-article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
 GA |
This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale. |
[edit] GA passed
- 1. Well written? Pass
- 2. Factually accurate? Pass
- 3. Broad in coverage? Pass
- 4. Neutral point of view? Pass
- 5. Article stability? Pass
- 6. Images? Pass
Additional comment : Make sure that the inline citations come after the punctuation.
I am impressed by the prose of the section describing the song which is quite innovative in such articles and quite riveting at its attempt to bring such information to the reader. Lincher 20:11, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
- That's great news, and while I'm quite proud of the article as it is, it's still a work in progress. I'm really hoping to (rather sooner than later) get it up to WP:FA quality; any feedback from anyone who may have reviewed it during the WP:GA process would be appreciated. --keepsleeping slack off! 21:03, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
-
- The following is what one editor's assessment of the article is (which'll aid people in this article gaining FA status;
The Beautiful People is a nice article. I'd stub out or remove as many of the redlinks as possible; try to find more reviews (only 2?!); get a source for the discography info. Also there's info which is in the lead but not in the body. --kingboyk 11:45, 17 October 2006
-
- I feel addressing these concerns would vastly improve its chances of FA. Also, the charting information (gaining number 26) should be covered under "Critical response" as well as in the lead. LuciferMorgan 17:26, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Well i'm not necessarily a fan of Manson much anymore, but have stumbled upon this page, and must say this is the way a page should look like. good job with this page.
