Talk:The Junior Woodchucks
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is in the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! Edit the article attached to this page or discuss it at the project talk page. Help with current tasks, or visit the notice board. | ||
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. Please explain the rating here. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's importance scale. | ||
 |
This article has been automatically rated as Stub-Class by the Comics WikiProject because it uses a stub template.
|
||
I know that the JW are boys-only in the Barks-Rosa version, but other stories have shown the JW to have girls among their regular members, an example of that is H 84099. 13:57, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
- I for myself have never seen girl members in JW. In fact, quite the opposite: the JW fiercely competes against another, girl-only, scout organisation. JIP | Talk 12:40, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
I suppose if we are pushing to 1.0, we are probably aspiring to make Wikipedia something as useful as the Junior Woodchucks Guidebook. Perhaps we should rename it to that, for cheap publicity, as Disney's notoriously mean spirited lawyers come after us. Certainly the real Junior Woodchucks will then ride to our rescue!! On camels no doubt, and out of the Rub-al-Khali!
Are self-references as blatent as such nessecary? -- user:zanimum
- * * * * *
Well if Wikipedia becomes the new Junior Woodchuck manual, (and it's getting that way), this is one little black duck that's not going to carry it around with him!
Something that is not mentioned in article or talk, is the humorous allusion to Freemasonry implicit in the Manual, including its many orders and quasi-mystical background. It's like a cross between the Boy Scouts and the Masons. I wonder if the author ever said anything about it. Because as it stands, the JW manual is a nice piece of satire on every secret society with the "answers to everything" in their little black book. This aspect should have been mentioned in the article. abzorba 06:49, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
