Talk:Theramenes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Theramenes is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do.
Article Milestones Date Process Result September 21, 2006 WikiProject peer review Reviewed September 20, 2006 Peer review Reviewed September 26, 2006 Featured article candidate Promoted Current Status: Featured article

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
FA	This article has been rated as FA-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] (If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
FA	This article has been rated as FA-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information: This article has had a peer review which is now archived. Related task forces (periods and conflicts): Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC–c. 500 AD)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome. To participate, improve this article or visit the project page for more information.
FA	This article has been rated as FA-Class on the assessment scale.
Mid	This article is on a subject of mid-importance within classical antiquity.

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Greece; If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.
FA	This article has been rated as FA-Class on the quality scale (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
Additional information: This article is supported by the Politics and politicians task force.

[edit] Peer review by me (User:Tutmosis)

• Comment: here are some small problems:
  • In the lead first paragraph please state a date range for when he was active in politics and a general. Example "was a general from 411 B.C - 407 B.C."
  • "appeared on the scene" used atleast twice. As far as I know that's slang. Is that really encyclopedic tone?
  • A long sentences and probably more of them:
    

"Nicias, one of the leading politicians in Athens after the death of Pericles, had been the primary advocate of the Peace of Nicias, which ended the first part of the Peloponnesian War in 421 BC, and had been in supreme command of the Sicilian Expedition, dying in Sicily Hagnon, meanwhile, had commanded the group of Greek colonists who founded Amphipolis in 437/6 BC, had served as a general on several occasions before and during the Peloponnesian War, and was one of the signers of the Peace of Nicias."

• • "This intrigue was initiated" Is "intrigue" really the right for what you trying to say? Picture caption of Alcibiades uses a better word "incited".
  • A tip I recommend is to put one/two-word description a lot more often before names. Instead of just "Bob" say "general Bob" or even "Spartan general Bob"
  • Other concern is through out the article there is a lack of background information. In some places of the text the reader is expected to know Athens history. Here are some examples:
    • "In the wake of the Athenian defeat in Sicily" what defeat?
    • "...promised to return to Athens...promised to return to Athens..." Why was Tissaphernes exiled... Who is he?
    • "he persuaded the assembly" which assembly is being refered to?
    • "demanded greater and greater concessions of them until they finally refused to comply." concessions from who and concessions for what?
    • "emissaries returned to Samos" which ones? So far you only mentioned the only emissary was Peisander trip to Athens.
    • "encouraged Samian oligarchs to begin planning a coup of their own" to overthrow Samos you mean? otherwise I thought all the conspirators were at Samos.
    • "oligarchic revolutionaries succeeded in gaining de facto" were they part of the main group of conspirators at Samos or a seperate group?
    • "This led to a rise in anti-oligarchic sentiments among the soldiers" I get the rest of the sentence but not how the failed coup at samos "led" to this. Werent the soldiers already on the democratic side?
    • "Theramenes protested strongly against the building of this fortification...but to let the Spartans in" How is building more fortification going to "let the spartans in"?
    • "Thucydides testifies that his charges were not without substance" Thucydides pops out of no where. State "The historian" so we know who he is.
    • "Theramenes charged that this fleet was planning to seize the fortifications on Eteiona" What you mean by "charged"? I dont get it. And what did this lead to?
    • "Athenian militiaman assassinated Phrynichus" Why?
    • "Argive accomplice was captured" Argive links to a place. Did you mean the militiaman accoplice from the above point?
    • "Peloponnesian fleet overrunning Aegina" I thought they were going to Euboea?
    • "enraged, the leaders of the 400 demanded action" I though when the extremists took control the 400 since the extremists were part of the 400. So how can they take control if they still one big party with the moderates?
    • "the wall was a good idea, he responded that if they wanted to pull it down, he thought that would be good." What wall? Why is it relevant?
    • "the 5,000 to govern" Who are the 5000? Or you mean 5000 people will be recruited?
    • "the hoplites tearing down the wall might well have preferred a return to the democracy." Tearing down walls makes you believe in democracy?
    • "the Peloponnesian fleet approached Piraeus" Again why did they come. You said they were going to Euboea.
    • "...Aegean suppressing oligarchies" Wasnt Theramenes an oligarch? Why would he suppress them?
    • Alcibiades is mentioned through out as being part of different wars/battles but I didn't catch what position he held when the oligarch took control of Athens?
    • "In command" and "Arginusae" sections throw battles/wars at the reader like there is no tommorow. Try to elaborate more on this battles. Sometimes I didnt even know who Theramenes was attacking against, all I got was a name of a place or person.
    • Okay finally in "Negotiating a peace" I understood that the Peloponnesian War was going on during all this time. Please mentions clearly through out the article this. Its only mentioned in the lead and not very clearly. Based on the lead I thought it was some 1 year war before Theramenes died.
    • "appointed by the members of the oligarchic social clubs to plan the transition to an oligarchy" Werent it allready an oligarchy? Or did the Spartans forced them to become a democracy? Or was the 5000 a democracy?

Please note some of this points might be irellevant since I might of missed a small detail but never the less, the article at times became confusing. - Tutmosis 18:05, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

I forgot, gramatically speaking the article is pretty good except for the sentences with a lot of commas. In those sentences solely because of the commas their might be a gramatical error. - Tutmosis 18:09, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for the detailed feedback! It's great to hear from someone who isn't as familiar with the topic and can point out potential sources of confusion. I've tried to clarify everything that you had questions about above; the question of the destination of the Spartan fleet is the one thing I didn't change anything on, as it is a tricky issue; the fleet was ostensibly headed for Euboea, but, as Theramenes and his allies pointed out, its actions appear to indicate that it was actually headed for Athens. Thanks again for doing such a thorough review. --Robth^Talk 19:57, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

No problem, thanks for adressing the issues so I can vote at the FAC. - Tutmosis 20:10, 25 September 2006 (UTC)