User talk:TheWoodmanIII
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You think to lecture me about a neutral point of view when yours was so obviously biased? I beleive my comments are neutral while yours are merely a judgement on a long dead person. Moreover, did any of my changes to the article appear to show "self righteous tendancies"? A neutral point of view is a goal that may never be reached, but you seem to beleive that I unbalanced the article in some way. Where? Comment on the page if you can find my bias. Cyclonus0102 22:54, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
No matter what you may say about the relativity of neutrality, the fact remains that your edits were improper then. You can hide behind your judgements of me and of neutrality, but that does not mean that you were correct in the judgements you make. Neutrality does exsist, just because you cannot see anything beyond yourself does not mean that others are likewise limited. 68.101.67.16 19:45, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
